Comments on: Department Of Homeland Security Worried About Mark Sanford’s Disappearance

By: sbj

sbj — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 23:00:34 +0000

I will return it for . . . one million dollars!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Q_ZzUqehbc&feature=related

By: lamh31

lamh31 — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 22:25:12 +0000

And SBJ hijacks another thread.

By: sbj

sbj — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:56:05 +0000

Well, Chris, that is one heck of a comment – “na na na na na na – sbj is a psycho!” Hold on a minute and let me write that one down so I don’t forget how to put someone in their place.

By: Chris

Chris — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:43:14 +0000

Is there anyone who makes less sense than SBJ? Seriously. He’s the one who can’t bring himself to admit that it was his very own Republican Party that brought about the need for an economic stimulus bill in the first place. He also can’t bring himself to admit it was 8 years of conservative Republican rule that created the world we live in today. And now he wants GS to admit to something that is totally apples and oranges to what GS was talking about. This is borderline psycho.

By: Jenn D

Jenn D — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:59:21 +0000

You know what, if you want to keep going on this one, that is fine with me, because as usual you are trying to excuse and deflect the hypocrisy of Republican elected officials back onto ME. I am not the one that runs campaign ads tauting “traditional family values” while I am ******** around on my wife and I am not the one calling on other politicians that have faltered to resign while I am ******** around on my wife. You state that it is not hypocrisy to strive to do the right thing and then fail and you are exactly right…, but it is hypocrisy to create a political platform tauting “traditional family values” while at the very same time you are ******** around on your wife! Ensign was a Promise Keeper for godsake, Sanford literally cut campaign ads about he being the one who stands up for “traditional family values”…good lord, you don’t even have the ability to acknowledge that, you are simply trying to deflect the hypocrisy of these Republican elected officials back onto ME, which chase your tail if you must, but I have never screwed around on my husband and I have never run campaign ads tauting myself as the example of “traditional family values” and I certainly have never preached to anyone about how they should live and what their family values should look like. It is unfortunate, but typical, that you would deflect away from this issue by trying to turn it around on me, instead of placing the blame at the Republican leaders that are behaving in this manner. And I think we can all agree that no one has a monopoly on hypocrisy, but only one political party in the Country claims to have the monopoly on “traditional family values”.

By: sbj

sbj — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:44:22 +0000

@JennD: I think some of your comments here would make pretty good definitions for “hypocrisy.”

You’ve got to understand that it is not hypocrisy to strive to do the right thing and then fail. That’s what we all do. OTOH, I think practically all politicians are hypocrites in one way or another – the Repubs certainly don’t hold a monopoly on that!

By: Jenn D

Jenn D — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:31:50 +0000

No, actually I have an unhealthy preoccupation with hypocrisy. And I would only hope that Republican politicians that ram “traditional family values” down the throats of the citizens of this Country would begin to listen to your advice, because you may not care about the *** lives of politicians, but the majority of the Republican politicians make “federal cases” out of other peoples *** lives. Here’s hoping they begin to listen to your advice about keeping their nose out of everyone elses bedroom.

By: sbj

sbj — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:25:08 +0000

@JennD: You seem to have an unhealthy preoccupation with the *** lives of politicians.

I don’t particularly care if a politician has some perverse/immoral/whatever *** that doesn’t interfere with his job. In fact, I don’t want to know about it. Unlike you, I’d rather not judge the morality of others. When their actions costs me money, or when it interferes with their public duties, or when they lie about it in civil court, then I feel they should resign or be censured. Otherwise I would leave it up to the voters.

By: Jenn D

Jenn D — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:15:36 +0000

“Hypocrisy negates ones beliefs”

By: Jenn D

Jenn D — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:14:20 +0000

That’s pretty obvious. And what exactly would you call all of the Republican elected officials that come out in droves to call on Democratic elected officials to resign when they get “caught with their pants down” (couldn’t help it) – If Sanford and Ensign and Vetter and Craig and Gingrich and all the other GOPers that have strayed were Democrats, the Republicans would be holding daily press conferences demanding that they resign from their offices! At least Spitzer and McGreevy resigned…but oh no, not the Republican guys (exception Foley & underaged pages), they just cannot resign because they simply have much to much to offer the rest of us sinners.

By: sbj

sbj — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:03:20 +0000

@JennD: I think that you and I must have completely different definitions of what judging means.

By: Jenn D

Jenn D — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:59:51 +0000

sbj~ The difference between me (who sins early and often) and them is that I DON’T judge others, while they continuosly judge others and lecture others about what the proper “family values” are…I do not judge or lecture others about their values or their families, but they, on the other hand have made a national political platform out of it…so take your argument on this one and move on down the road…when “Christian Conservative” Republicans stop running on “family/traditional values” then I will stop pointing out their godforesaken hypocritical rhetoric!!

By: Jenn D

Jenn D — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:55:34 +0000

Umm sbj, you should really do some research on Palin…this is totally her MO…she never takes responsibility for anything…everything that happens to her is everyone elses fault, like when she quit the Oil and Gas Commission because of those “big, bad ethically challenged board members” that she was serving with, but yet she forgot to mention (publically at least) that she was about to be overruled on some of her initiatives by fellow members…Palin is a classic Republican, she only wants to talk with or work with people that agree with her.

By: sbj

sbj — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:54:31 +0000

@JennD: “I think there’s a few other lines that are pretty easy to find. That one about Thou shall not judge, for starters. There’s another about He who is without sin casting stones and such.

By: sbj

sbj — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:51:44 +0000

@Greg. Well fine then – I believe we [mostly] agree!

You’re a great sport, Greg. How about enlightening us on what it is like to live in your new digs? Any good restaurants? Characters talking to themselves on the corner?