Who Runs Gov

The Plum LineGreg Sargent's blog

Did Obama Accuse Dick Cheney Of Torture?

Pretty interesting. President Obama also said this during the CBS News interview:

“”I fundamentally disagree with Dick Cheney. Not surprisingly. You know, I think that Vice President Cheney has been at the head of a movement whose notion is somehow that we can’t reconcile our core values, our Constitution, our belief that we don’t torture, with our national security interests. I think he’s drawing the wrong lesson from history.”

A reader points out that Obama himself here came awfully close to directly accusing Cheney of torture.

This would seem to be a big deal. If Obama has now said that Cheney sanctioned torture, how can that not have relevance with regard to the question of whether the Obama administration will support some kind of probe into what really happened during the Bush years?

The homepage of this blog is here. RSS feed here. Twitter feed here. Email me here.

Posted by Greg Sargent | 03/23/2009, 10:51 AM EST | Categories: President Obama, Probes of Bush administration, national security, torture

13 Responses

  1. sgwhiteinfla | March 23rd, 2009 at 10:58 am

    I bet Dick Cheney is going to shut his mouth for awhile after this. The question is will any pressure be put on President Obama now to prosecute.

  2. ThomasT | March 23rd, 2009 at 11:08 am

    It is going to be VERY interesting to see how the political press plays this. Of course, they have served as Cheney’s buttboys in covering up his complicity in torture, war crimes, and other illegal acts. On the other hand, it’s a great opportunity for the press to jump on the hyperventilatory Drudge-horing that they are so addicted to by playing this as yet another Obama gaffe. What to do? What to do? Hyperventilate over Obama’s “gaffe” or play buttboy for Cheney? Break out the popcorn!

  3. Luther Grunge | March 23rd, 2009 at 11:26 am

    Above and beyond the torture what about Cheney’s stock ownership in for profit prisons built and run by Vanguard? How many are being held for profit?

  4. Kathleen Hussein in Maine | March 23rd, 2009 at 11:38 am

    That was not a gaffe. That was a gauntlet.

  5. Why oh why | March 23rd, 2009 at 11:39 am

    Both Obama and Holder have already said that waterboarding is torture, and the previous administration ordered waterboarding. So Obama has already accused Cheney of torture, now he should do something about it.

  6. igotthis | March 23rd, 2009 at 11:59 am

    Yes, the gauntlet has been laid and the ax is about to fall on Cheney and whole the Bush admininistration’s unconstitutional torture campaign. The Obama administration will release documents detailing the degree to which the CIA and the government tortured Guantanamo Bay detainees, which means the Obama administration is saying, “let the truth commission and criminal investigations begin.” Thank God, Cheney does not know how to shup-up!

  7. Didi/Gogo | March 23rd, 2009 at 12:08 pm

    I think it was a message to Cheney to shut his pie hole. Obama is taking a political hit for not going after Cheney (so far) and Cheney is still out there running his mouth.

    I also think he could have tipped his hand and that there is a possibility that the DOJ in building a case against Bush and Cheney and the reason why Obama wants to pass healthcare, energy independence and the rest within his first year, is that he’s going to go after BushCo soon after. The DOJ brought in a lot of outspoken opponents to the Bush torture programs, they could be building a case without any of the embedded Bushies really knowing about it.

    Going after Bush right away would have been a partisan firestorm, however when Bush/Cheney is removed from being seen as the leadership of the GOP, the partisan response could be muted.

  8. sgwhiteinfla | March 23rd, 2009 at 12:14 pm

    why oh why
    .
    But if you notice Obama nor Holder ever pointed to who they felt was responsible for ordering the waterboarding. Notice the word “head” in the phrase “head of a movement”. Could be trouble thats all Im saying.

  9. Crust | March 23rd, 2009 at 04:25 pm

    Obama and many others (Holder as many mentioned, even McCain) have in essence already accused Cheney of torture when they took the position that waterboarding is torture.
    .
    Obama goes a step further here though when he appears to say not only that Cheney sanctioned torture, but that he knew he was doing so. Or in other words, he appears to question Bush/Cheney’s good faith when they claim that they do not think waterboarding is torture and the US has not tortured.

  10. ROSEBUD | March 24th, 2009 at 02:08 am

    THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION NEVER ORDERED TORTURE, IF THEY DID, THEY CERTAINLY WOULD HAVE BEEN CALLED ON IT IN THE PAST 8 YEARS. THE TERM “ENHANCED INTERROGATIONS” WAS USED TO DESCRIBE WHAT THE CIA HAD CONFIRMED WITH JUSTICE APPROVAL AS A MEANS TO OBTAIN INFORMATION THAT WAS USED TO PREVENT OTHER TERRORISTS ACTIVITIES IN THE PLANNING AND QUITE SUCCESSFULLY AT THAT. STOP GROPING! GIVE IT A REST. WHY NOT SPEND TIME TALKING ABOUT WHAT GOT US THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE……BILL CLINTON’S INCOMPETENCE WAS THE CAUSE OF 9/11. SECONDLY, IT WAS BILL CLINTON WHO REORMED AND REINSTITUTED THE “THE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT” IN THE 90′S FROM THE OLD CARTER ADMINISTRATION OF THE 70′S AND FORCED THE FED TO LOWER THEIR CREDIT STANDARDS SO THAT MINORITIES WHO COULDN’T AFFORD HOMES COULD GET A MORTGAGE WITH NO INCOME, NO JOB AND NO MOMNEY DOWN. SO HERE WE ARE MR. CLINTON, WE OWE YOU ANOTHER 50 LASHES.

    BUSH ALSO INHERITED THE CLINTON RECESSION , WHICH CLINTON REFERRED TO AS THE “PROJECTED” SURPLUS…THE ONE THAT NEVER CAME BECAUSE IT WAS ONLY “PROJECTED”. FOR THE LAST 7 YEARS BUSH REMINDED CONGRESS THAT FANNIE & FREDDIE NEEDED REFORMING, BUT NO, ACCORDING TO BARNEY FRANK, CHRIS DODD, MAXINE WATERS AND SCHMUCKY SCHUMER,”THERE WERE NO PROBLEMS”. OF COURSE THE PROBLEMS WERE HIDDEN IN THEIR CAMPAIGN STASHES. NICE WORK GUYS. YOU’RE A REAL CREDIT TO THE COMMUNITY. WHEN THE HOUSING BUBBLE BURST, IT TOOK DOWN ALL THE BANKS THAT WERE FORCED TO TAKE THOSE BAD LOANS THROUGH THE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT THAT BILL CLINTON RESURRECTED IN THE 90′S. BARACK OBAMA WAS WORKING FOR ACORN UNDER MADELINE TALBOTT AT THIS TIME AS A COMMUNTIY ORGANIZER. HIS JOB WAS TO SHAKEDOWN BANKS AND COERCE THEM INTO GIVING LOANS TO PEOPLE WHO WERE ON WELFARE OR UNEMPLOYMENT. TALBOTT WAS SO IMPRESSED WITH OBAMA SHE HIRED HIM TO TRAIN OTHERS AND ACORN SPREAD THEIR WORK ACROSS THE COUNTRY. THOSE BAD LOANS WERE BUNDLED AND SOLD TO MAJOR INVESTMENT BANKS AND INSTITUTIONS ALL OVER THE WORLD. WHEN THEY DEFAULTED, IT BECAME A GLOBAL CRISIS NOT JUST AMERICANS WERE INVOLVED. WHEN WITHT HE HELP OF ACORN, OBAMA MOVED QUICKLY FROM THE STATE OF ILLINOIS TO THE US SENATE BECAUSE OF HIS AGENDA, HE WASTED NOT TIME. WHEN
    BARACK OBAMA WAS IN THE SENATE, HE SERVED HIS WHOLE 160 DAYS, AND TOOK CAMPAIGN MONEY FROM THESE BANKS INCLUDING FANNIE & FREDDIE. HIS FRIEND FRANKLIN RAINES, THE CEO GAVE HIMSELF A $100 MIL BONUS. ODDLY ENOUGH JAMIE GORELICK FROM THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION, YOU REMEMBER THE DEPUTY AG WHO REFUSED THE LET THE FBI EXAMINE MUSSAUIS COMPETER SO WE WOUL DHAVE BEEN WARNED ABOUT 9/11? SHE ALSO MADE MILLIONS WORKING FOR THEM TOO AND RAHM EMANUEL WHO SERVED IN THE HOUSE AND UNDER THE CLINTON CRONIES, ALSO MADE $16 MIL. STRANGE HOW THE WHOLE CREW IS BACK RUNNING THE WHITE HOUSE AGAIN , ISN’T IT? THE SAME PEOPLE WHO SCREWED UP THE 90′S ARE BACK AGAIN. WHAT’S IN STORE FOR US NEXT, NOW THAT WE ARE INVOLVED WTH THE CHICAGO MACHINE? WE ARE BEING RULED BY A BUNCH OF RADICALS AND OBAMA IS GOING TO TAKE US DOWN A SLIPPERY SLOPE OF RADICAL SOCIAL CHANGE. HE’S BEHOLDEN TO THE UNIONS AND ACORN, HE PAID THEM $800 TO HELP GET HIM ELECTED AND THEN REWARDD THEM WITH $5.6 MIL IN THE STIMULIUS BILL, THAT NOBODY READ ABOUT UNTIL AFTER. HE DID. AFTER HE GETS US OUT OF THIS MESS THAT HE HIMSELF CONTRIBUTED TO, HE’S GOING TO HAVE ACORN RUN THE NEXT CENSUS FROM THE WHITE HOUSE. HE’LL TAKE AWAY YOUR PENSIONS WHICH HAVE BEEN PRETTY MUCH WORKED OVER ALREADY AND YOUR RIGHTS WILL SLOWLY BE DIMINISHED UNTIL YOU SUCCUMB TO RADICAL SOCIALISTIC MARXISM, HIS RELIGION FOR 20 YEARS UNDER THE REVEREND WRIGHT WHO PREACHED ANTI-AMERICAN BLACK LIBERATION THEOLOGY, MARXISM. THIS IS OBAMA’S MOVEMENT INTO THE UNKNOWN. THOSE OF YOU WHO WERE ENARMOURED BY HIS SPEECHES NEVER BOTHERED TO REALLY LISTEN. YOU WANTED HOPE AND CHANGE. THE ONLY HOPE IS THAT YOU HAVE SOME CHANGE LEFT IN YOUR POCKETS.

  11. ROSEBUD | March 24th, 2009 at 02:16 am

    THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION NEVER ORDERED TORTURE, IF THEY DID, THEY CERTAINLY WOULD HAVE BEEN CALLED ON IT IN THE PAST 8 YEARS. THE TERM “ENHANCED INTERROGATIONS” WAS USED TO DESCRIBE WHAT THE CIA HAD CONFIRMED WITH JUSTICE APPROVAL AS A MEANS TO OBTAIN INFORMATION THAT WAS USED TO PREVENT OTHER TERRORISTS ACTIVITIES IN THE PLANNING AND QUITE SUCCESSFULLY AT THAT. STOP GROPING! GIVE IT A REST. WHY NOT SPEND TIME TALKING ABOUT WHAT GOT US THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE……BILL CLINTON’S INCOMPETENCE WAS THE CAUSE OF 9/11. SECONDLY, IT WAS BILL CLINTON WHO REORMED AND REINSTITUTED THE “THE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT” IN THE 90′S FROM THE OLD CARTER ADMINISTRATION OF THE 70′S AND FORCED THE FED TO LOWER THEIR CREDIT STANDARDS SO THAT MINORITIES WHO COULDN’T AFFORD HOMES COULD GET A MORTGAGE WITH NO INCOME, NO JOB AND NO MOMNEY DOWN. SO HERE WE ARE MR. CLINTON, WE OWE YOU ANOTHER 50 LASHES.

    BUSH ALSO INHERITED THE CLINTON RECESSION , WHICH CLINTON REFERRED TO AS THE “PROJECTED” SURPLUS…THE ONE THAT NEVER CAME BECAUSE IT WAS ONLY “PROJECTED”. FOR THE LAST 7 YEARS BUSH REMINDED CONGRESS THAT FANNIE & FREDDIE NEEDED REFORMING, BUT NO, ACCORDING TO BARNEY FRANK, CHRIS DODD, MAXINE WATERS AND SCHMUCKY SCHUMER,”THERE WERE NO PROBLEMS”. OF COURSE THE PROBLEMS WERE HIDDEN IN THEIR CAMPAIGN STASHES. NICE WORK GUYS. YOU’RE A REAL CREDIT TO THE COMMUNITY. WHEN THE HOUSING BUBBLE BURST, IT TOOK DOWN ALL THE BANKS THAT WERE FORCED TO TAKE THOSE BAD LOANS THROUGH THE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT THAT BILL CLINTON RESURRECTED IN THE 90′S. BARACK OBAMA WAS WORKING FOR ACORN UNDER MADELINE TALBOTT AT THIS TIME AS A COMMUNTIY ORGANIZER. HIS JOB WAS TO SHAKEDOWN BANKS AND COERCE THEM INTO GIVING LOANS TO PEOPLE WHO WERE ON WELFARE OR UNEMPLOYMENT. TALBOTT WAS SO IMPRESSED WITH OBAMA SHE HIRED HIM TO TRAIN OTHERS AND ACORN SPREAD THEIR WORK ACROSS THE COUNTRY. THOSE BAD LOANS WERE BUNDLED AND SOLD TO MAJOR INVESTMENT BANKS AND INSTITUTIONS ALL OVER THE WORLD. WHEN THEY DEFAULTED, IT BECAME A GLOBAL CRISIS NOT JUST AMERICANS WERE INVOLVED. WHEN WITHT HE HELP OF ACORN, OBAMA MOVED QUICKLY FROM THE STATE OF ILLINOIS TO THE US SENATE BECAUSE OF HIS AGENDA, HE WASTED NOT TIME. WHEN
    BARACK OBAMA WAS IN THE SENATE, HE SERVED HIS WHOLE 160 DAYS, AND TOOK CAMPAIGN MONEY FROM THESE BANKS INCLUDING FANNIE & FREDDIE. HIS FRIEND FRANKLIN RAINES, THE CEO GAVE HIMSELF A $100 MIL BONUS. ODDLY ENOUGH JAMIE GORELICK FROM THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION, YOU REMEMBER THE DEPUTY AG WHO REFUSED THE LET THE FBI EXAMINE MUSSAUIS COMPETER SO WE WOULD HAVE BEEN WARNED ABOUT 9/11? SHE ALSO MADE MILLIONS WORKING FOR THEM TOO AND RAHM EMANUEL WHO SERVED IN THE HOUSE AND UNDER THE CLINTON CRONIES, ALSO MADE $16 MIL. STRANGE HOW THE WHOLE CREW IS BACK RUNNING THE WHITE HOUSE AGAIN , ISN’T IT? THE SAME PEOPLE WHO SCREWED UP THE 90′S ARE BACK AGAIN. WHAT’S IN STORE FOR US NEXT, NOW THAT WE ARE INVOLVED WTH THE CHICAGO MACHINE? WE ARE BEING RULED BY A BUNCH OF RADICALS AND OBAMA IS GOING TO TAKE US DOWN A SLIPPERY SLOPE OF RADICAL SOCIAL CHANGE. HE’S BEHOLDEN TO THE UNIONS AND ACORN, HE PAID THEM $800K TO HELP GET HIM ELECTED AND THEN REWARDD THEM WITH $5.6 MIL IN THE STIMULIUS BILL THAT NOBODY READ ABOUT UNTIL AFTER. HE MADE SURE IT WENT IN. AFTER HE GETS US OUT OF THIS MESS THAT HE HIMSELF CONTRIBUTED TO, HE’S GOING TO HAVE ACORN RUN THE NEXT CENSUS FROM THE WHITE HOUSE IN 2010. HE’LL TAKE AWAY YOUR PENSIONS WHICH HAVE BEEN PRETTY MUCH WORKED OVER ALREADY AND YOUR RIGHTS WILL SLOWLY BE DIMINISHED UNTIL YOU SUCCUMB TO RADICAL SOCIALISTIC MARXISM, HIS RELIGION FOR 20 YEARS UNDER THE REVEREND WRIGHT WHO PREACHED ANTI-AMERICAN BLACK LIBERATION THEOLOGY, MARXISM. THIS IS OBAMA’S MOVEMENT INTO THE UNKNOWN. THOSE OF YOU WHO WERE ENARMOURED BY HIS SPEECHES NEVER BOTHERED TO REALLY LISTEN. YOU WANTED HOPE AND CHANGE. THE ONLY HOPE IS THAT YOU HAVE SOME CHANGE LEFT IN YOUR POCKETS AND EVEN THEN HE’LL TRY TO BLAME IT ON BUSH.

  12. David Swanson | March 24th, 2009 at 02:18 pm

    Well, like yeah, because that’s what you do with, you know, crimes, you consider holding probes. Otherwise, like, what would deter the criminals?

  13. Ruben Robles | April 7th, 2009 at 12:15 pm

    I’m preying every day to hear from the FED they are firing all the Big 5 Banks CEO’S because they are who are trying to worse the Houses crisis.In my personal view and experirence they are not helping familys who really wants stay in their homes and only are pleased to help them with a loan modification lowering their payments and even if they are working but there’s hours were cut they want still paying with a good faith of the loan modification instead the Banks are aproving only a few and denied a lot.what they are trying is delaying the crisis and acting as a passive form of economic terrorism agaisnt the Goverment that we the US worker citizen elected….The goverment must act NOW and FAST before be late…..FIRED THEM………NOW

Leave a Reply


Please email us at profiles@whorunsgov.com to bring to our attention any content or conduct that you believe violates our Discussion and Submission Policy.