<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Happy Hour Roundup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/political-media/happy-hour-roundup-39/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/political-media/happy-hour-roundup-39/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:17:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: actuator</title>
		<link>http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/political-media/happy-hour-roundup-39/comment-page-1/#comment-34569</link>
		<dc:creator>actuator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 03:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/?p=9664#comment-34569</guid>
		<description>Seems that Waxman-Markey has a little provision that allows SSA to dip into general funds just in case the bill results in reduced revenues from FICA and Medicare.  Can this mean that the authors are well aware that this is a job loss proposition and they have arranged to cover SSA losses in advance?  I think the answer is yes.  And how about that hidden entitlement increasing the Earned Income Credit for single taxpayers with no dependents?  Some people are finally reading the fine print and the more they read the tougher the sledding will be in the Senate, 60 votes notwithstanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems that Waxman-Markey has a little provision that allows SSA to dip into general funds just in case the bill results in reduced revenues from FICA and Medicare.  Can this mean that the authors are well aware that this is a job loss proposition and they have arranged to cover SSA losses in advance?  I think the answer is yes.  And how about that hidden entitlement increasing the Earned Income Credit for single taxpayers with no dependents?  Some people are finally reading the fine print and the more they read the tougher the sledding will be in the Senate, 60 votes notwithstanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jzap</title>
		<link>http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/political-media/happy-hour-roundup-39/comment-page-1/#comment-34510</link>
		<dc:creator>jzap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/?p=9664#comment-34510</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;The Obama administration is now seeking to delay the release of the big 2004 CIA torture report ...&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Antelope Freeway, one-eighth mile...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><i>The Obama administration is now seeking to delay the release of the big 2004 CIA torture report &#8230;</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Antelope Freeway, one-eighth mile&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sgwhiteinfla</title>
		<link>http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/political-media/happy-hour-roundup-39/comment-page-1/#comment-34498</link>
		<dc:creator>sgwhiteinfla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/?p=9664#comment-34498</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm, didn&#039;t I say putting that dumb@ss claim in the ad was going to come back to haunt the GOOPers?  What a bunch of clowns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm, didn&#8217;t I say putting that dumb@ss claim in the ad was going to come back to haunt the GOOPers?  What a bunch of clowns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
