Who Runs Gov

The Plum LineGreg Sargent's blog

Twitter Co-Founder: Obama’s State Department Can’t Tell Us What To Do

Twitter co-founder Biz Stone has now spoken out about the extraordinary reports saying that the State Department asked Twitter officials to postpone a planned maintenance shut-down because of the role the networking service was playing in getting news out about Iran.

In a fascinating new blog post, Stone links approvingly to a Reuters story reporting that State did make the request — which is basically confirmation. But he also downplayed the idea that State could tell Twitter what to do:

It’s humbling to think that our two-year old company could be playing such a globally meaningful role that state officials find their way toward highlighting our significance. However, it’s important to note that the State Department does not have access to our decision making process. Nevertheless, we can both agree that the open exchange of information is a positive force in the world.

The Twitter co-founder is probably downplaying State’s influence over Twitter because news organizations are interpreting State’s requests as a sign that the Obama administration is trying to influence events in Iran.

Either way, Twitter’s self-congratulatory claim that this new technology is bypassing governments to influence global events — so much so that the U.S. asked for its help — is not an exaggeration. Which is kind of amazing.

The homepage of this blog is here. RSS feed here. Twitter feed here. Email me here.

Posted by Greg Sargent | 06/17/2009, 08:16 AM EST | Categories: Iran, Middle East, State Department

9 Responses

  1. Danp | June 17th, 2009 at 08:20 am

    I’m trying to understand the difference between Biz Stone’s statement and “We really don’t give a damn about our customers in Iran.”

  2. AllButCertain | June 17th, 2009 at 08:46 am

    Agree, Danp. Twitter’s gotten a little big headed in its two years? On a side note, I wonder if the role of Twitter in what’s going on in iran means we al have to twitter. God I hope not.

  3. AllButCertain | June 17th, 2009 at 08:47 am

    That would be all not al, and Iran not iran. (Maybe my brain is ready to twitter.)

  4. Jill | June 17th, 2009 at 09:36 am

    Why does everyone knock Twitter..It’s all in who you follow..If you follow idiots you will get idiotic tweets. If you follow intelligent people and organizations you will get intelligent tweets. Give Twitter a break!

  5. Bernie Latham | June 17th, 2009 at 09:40 am

    dam twitr
    .
    side issue…the NRO/Commentary crowd are pushing “Obama supports present Iranian regime” meme

  6. Greg Sargent | June 17th, 2009 at 09:50 am

    Bernie, are they explicitly saying he backs it?

  7. Bernie Latham | June 17th, 2009 at 10:04 am

    Greg – Kagan (in his WP op-ed this morning), argues that Obama has made a choice (following a “realist” philosophy) to support the present regime and to undercut the protests and ferment.
    - Hayes, at The Weekly Standard, has a piece up along with a blog post, “His [Obama's] policy is regime preservation”
    - Jennifer Rubin at Commentary, “It is clear what’s up. All he wants to do is talk, so he can’t give offense. Fine — he’ll deal with Ahmadinejad if the regime can crush the protesters. He is an enabler now, a cheerleader against regime change. Shameful.”

  8. Bernie Latham | June 17th, 2009 at 10:11 am

    Wash Independ has more as well… http://washingtonindependent.com/47146/neocons-house-gopers-demand-obama-take-mousavis-side

  9. gonzone | June 17th, 2009 at 10:27 am

    And here at home Twitter has been an amazing tool for pulling the white hoods off our racist politicians so we see them for what they really are.
    Seems racism code words are not a function of Twitter.

    Tweet! Tweet! AAH! (had glimpses of Chris, our little Tweety bird)

Leave a Reply


Please email us at profiles@whorunsgov.com to bring to our attention any content or conduct that you believe violates our Discussion and Submission Policy.