I do not care about unemployment, supposed “costs of living”, inflation, or any of that **** that democrats try to throw around. Here are real numbers for all of you:

In eight years of Bush here is what we have:

34% of households own an HDTV. 82% of the population owns a cell phone. 30% of those considered living in “poverty” own a cell phone instead of a landline. 8/10 houses own a computer in comparison to 48% at the end of Clinton’s presidency and 20% at the beginning. 60% of households have a gaming console. 92% have cable service. High speed internet is in 60% of households. 70% of households own TWO OR MORE cars at any given time, The quality of living has gone up to insane limits!

Now let’s explain why that is crazy it happened, people who were in the technological field know why:

The cell phone came to be just after the expansion into space in 1960. Virtually no progression was made in Clinton’s presidency when it was ENTIRELY possible. This was due to him choke holding business.

The techno boom happened in Clinton’s presidency. After the taxes those jobs shipped over seas because it was more cost efficient. Technological advancements were laughable.

Broadband capability was entirely possible in Clinton’s presidency. It remained too expensive until recently. The companies had no reason to push it with the taxes Clinton put in place for the rich. They exported most of their software and services to other countries.

The last 2 years of Clinton’s presidency the republicans managed to balance the budget, and set everything up to happen as it has now other than the econommic crises which was the direct fault of Fannie Mae Freddie Mac and bank regulation (that is what cause AIG’s collapse and every other company’s collapse as well) which we have on TAPE with them partyline vote blocking it and insulting the republicans for saying there could be a crises.

Yeah. Republicans sound horrible. You’re all totally right. They so are not for the mainstream public.

When kicked to the ground Americans get back up. It’s been proven that the socialist ideals during that time period slowed the progress.

Also for the record: During that democrat reign we had more war than any time period, more hate crimes, LESS progress, etc etc. I could go on.

Martin Luther was republican for a reason. Again, Nixon was one of the first people to support affirmative action. Democrats did nothing for black hate. They just took credit for it. During their reign we had EIGHTY years of black hate. Remind me…After Reagen and Bush Sr’s presidency just how much of a racism decrease was there? How much was there before during Carter’s presidency? The difference is not just small, it’s huge. The republican congress in that time fixed tons, which is why they took over at the time.

North Korea…WWII…Democrat congress.

What caused the first depression? A credit crises. Remind me…Who pushed credit and always has? (Democrats)

It is on rewind. You’re correct. And the republicans have fixed it many times. When a democrat tries to take a repbulican point and destroy it (like they always do) it does not make the republican point bad.

And to touch on some points: 30 years ago we started the war on drugs. Things are better. I want your definition of not better. I’d say drug gangs being nearly entirely eliminated and drug violence being far lower is a win.

20 years ago we dergulated…And almost every single large corporation now in existence came about and has it’s roots from that time period. Business exists now from it. That was a success. I would say that…Microsoft, Dell, and the other 80’s companies are a clear sign of that considering how much of a workforce they all have and contribute to economy. Coincidentally? Most of the firms with the largest amount of jobs for lazy democrats comes from kind republicans who would not employ more people with more taxes.

10 years ago we were told that the problem was welfare…Well I’d say that would be Bush Sr’s presidency so your time frame is off, but at that point it was true. We cut the last section which was putting us in debt. At the end of Clinton’s presidency (led by a repbulican congress which really is where the power is) we had a surplus from those mottos of cutting spending.

So get your head out of the pessimist gutter. You’re entirely wrong about our progression.

Less than 5,000 U.S. military died in the war with Iraq. Over 5,000 died in Clinton’s presidency.

As for the hundreds of thousands of deaths? Most of the media which covers that INCLUDES the deaths before we intervened which were caused by SADDAM.

Look into it: When we intervened in Iraq 300,000 Iraqi people had been killed by their own leader. It was a genocide comparable to WWII. This intervention was a GOOD intervention. Iraq is NOT a bad War.

For the record: Every single country which has been rebuilt has taken longer than Iraq has and has had more deaths. The problem is your “media” puts out biased facts. And actually for the record…Fox news is just about the only news station not entirely owned by liberals. Go look for other sources. It might do you some good. The Fannie Mae Freddie Mac issues can be found on youtube with every member who caused the crises denying the republicans the chance to fix it. The republicans then went further to point out people who received contributions 25 times higher than anyone else, and coincidentally they were against the new regulations. Coincidence?

Republicans are only about morals. You democrats are about power and being right.

Get your facts together kiddo.

Clinton’s Bosnia deaths total = 5000. Clinton’s American deaths in Bosnia = ZERO.

Bush’s Iraq deaths total = estimated in the hundreds of thousands. Bush’s American deaths in Iraq, approaching 5000.

Now THAT is a fair comparison. Bob, I don’t blame you for getting these facts wrong. You probably got your facts from Faux News.

When will Americans learn? Now Democrats were part of the lying as I alluded to above, but those demons that were destroying American were predominantly Republican talking points.

Why are we still listening to them?

Liberals were (for the most part) in charge of America from circa 1930 to circa 1985. It’s not a coincidence that this time period coincided with the biggest explosion in progress this planet has ever seen. Not that this country has ever seen, but this planet. (In 1959, the top tax rate on rich people was 92% _Eisenhower was such a socialist.)

And this was also a time period when parents could assume that their kids would always be better off then they were. And America could afford to land on the moon, build an interstate highway system from scratch, cure poverty in our elderly, provide health care for our elderly, expand college funding for our kids, fight a hot was in Vietnam and a massive cold war at the same time, and create a welfare system. We did tons of other things too.

Now, thanks to 30 years of the ascendency of supply side economics, and even Clinton (hardly a liberal) contributed to deregulation and the evisceration of welfare, wages for common Americans have been flat, and parents can no longer assume things will be better for their kids.

People, not only do we need more democrats in office, we desperately need a new New Deal. We need to give this nation back to the progressives.

Complain about a war enough it becomes truth. (Iraq) Clinton was “in military conflict” with over three countries in his term just like Bush. Over 5,000 people died. Less than 5,000 people died in Bush’s. Iraq is now a free nation. Remind me…What did Clinton’s actions do for Iraq? Kuwait? Nothing? Oh right. Sooooo They complained to damage image on the war with just about the least deaths in history.

The economic crises was the fault of the Democrats. Their approval ratings went down down down 2000 to 2008 then it jumped 200% when they intentionally decimated the republican image with the lies about the economic crises. Look it up. The 2005 regulations brought up by JOHN MCCAIN and 4 other repbulicans. They moved to SPECIFICALLY change regulations due to problems with Fannie Mae Freddie Mac. Every democrat who is now in charge of regulating those banks BLOCKED IT in a party line vote. They are doing the same thing that was done in Clinton’s presidency which resulted in the collapse: They are giving loans to people who can’t afford it. They caused this problem. Look it up.

To do with the republican image: The very fact that all of you think of republicans as bible thumping people who hate **** and blacks proves my point. Nixon started black rights. Martin Luther King Jr. was a republican. Yet the democrats took credit for this. Look it up.

Now then, the corrupt party is as it has been since FDR: And that is the democrats. They’ve been good at lying for a long time though. They resulted in a collapse of a market and blamed the free trade market. Where in the world are the poor as rich as here? Most communist nations don’t even have consistent power. It doesn’t work. Governments regulating pay? That sounds like a crock to me. Republicans are against that.

There’s a reason the republicans gained such popularity after a 41 year dominancy by democrats: They are a corrupt and worthless party. They took their edge this time by lying about Iraq, the Economy, and other issues. If Mccain had his way, the FACT is, that this crises would never have happened. PERIOD. So quit saying they don’t care. They do. Your democrats are only interested in labeling us republicans and lying as always. The republicans are only interested in perserving this country as it should be and making sure we don’t go through another recession like this from a lying pack of wolves.

Get it together people, before it’s too late.