Who Runs Gov

The Plum LineGreg Sargent's blog

Dem Congressman Denies Rahm Emanuel Muscled Him With Threat About Obama

Politicoes are buzzing today about a report saying that Rahm Emanuel made a rather outlandish-sounding threat against Dem Rep Steve Israel to dissuade him from mounting a primary against New York Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, who took over for Hillary.

The report said Rahm made it very clear to the Congressman in a private meeting that the White House would use all its power to defeat him, and that Obama would aggressively campaign against Israel in New York City’s black neighborhoods in order to ensure his defeat. This sort of race-tinged party bossism from Obama would be surprising on many levels, obviously.

It turns out, however, that Rahm never made the threat, according to Israel’s chief of staff, Jack Pratt. He says he got the denial straight from the Congressman himself. “It’s just not true,” Pratt told me.

Pratt said that he had been standing outside the room during the conversation at the White House between Israel and Rahm, and that there was no staff inside.

Pratt did confirm, however, that the White House did signal that they wanted Israel to steer clear of a primary — but that the meeting didn’t carry any real suggestion of bigfooting or threats.

“The idea that Rahm would threaten Steve, that’s not the way their relationship goes — they’re friends,” Pratt said. “They did convey pretty effectively that [the White House] was going to support the incumbent. But it was more, `In the interests of party unity, here are the reasons you’d be better off doing something else.’”

So maybe there’s a hint of bossism here. But just a hint.

Update: The editor of the Rahm piece emails that the publication is standing by the story, claiming it’s “fully-sourced and vetted” and “relies on multiple conversations” with people who heard the story straight from the Congressman. Read the full response here.

The homepage of this blog is here. RSS feed here. Twitter feed here. Email me here.

Posted by Greg Sargent | 05/22/2009, 03:00 PM EST | Categories: House Dems, President Obama, Senate Dems, White House, campaigns

9 Responses

  1. sgwhiteinfla | May 22nd, 2009 at 03:16 pm

    Leave it to GOPolitico. And just so we are clear here you realize that the article was really just a vehicle to put the “campaign in black neighborhoods” falsehood out, right? The rest of it would just look like Rahm putting his foot down but I imagine the wingnuts are having a field day with the race angle right now.

  2. Greg Sargent | May 22nd, 2009 at 03:20 pm

    SG — def worth checking out. thanks.

  3. evie | May 22nd, 2009 at 03:32 pm

    The story was too over the top to believe in the first place. Journos are obsessed with Rahm-the-enforcer stories. One fish apparently goes a long way.

  4. sgwhiteinfla | May 22nd, 2009 at 03:52 pm

    Mancow gets waterboarded, flips the script and says iits torture.
    .
    http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/Mancow-Takes-on-Waterboarding-and-Loses.html
    .
    Funny how it always ends up working out that way. Any wonder that Hannity won’t submit himself to it?

  5. Greg Sargent | May 22nd, 2009 at 03:58 pm

    SG — anyone else pick up on that yet?

  6. sgwhiteinfla | May 22nd, 2009 at 04:15 pm

    Greg
    .
    Yeah Steve Benen posted on it.

  7. sgwhiteinfla | May 22nd, 2009 at 04:25 pm

    Actually its spreading like wildfire now because it was on memeorandum. Matt Y, Chait and Coates all have posted on it now.

  8. lamh31 | May 22nd, 2009 at 06:16 pm

    Here’s hoping tha Mancow video goes viral

  9. Carol Herman | May 22nd, 2009 at 09:03 pm

    Hey! If you want to laugh, look at the promise to Senator Specter that Obama will campaign hard for him, now that he’s a democrat.

    Go ahead, keep threatening. Just makes my day! If Israel wants to test the waters? Having Obama in the enemy camp just might produce more votes than ya need to win. Get my drift?

Leave a Reply


Please email us at profiles@whorunsgov.com to bring to our attention any content or conduct that you believe violates our Discussion and Submission Policy.